• English
    • Türkçe
  • Türkçe 
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi / School of Business and Social Sciences
  • İşletme Bölümü / Department of Business Administration
  • Öğe Göster
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi / School of Business and Social Sciences
  • İşletme Bölümü / Department of Business Administration
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A new approach to Maslach Burnout Inventory: Measuring burnout syndrome in health‑care staff with fuzzy conjoint analysis

Thumbnail
Göster/Aç
A new approach to Maslach Burnout Inventory: Measuring burnout syndrome in health‑care staff with fuzzy conjoint analysis (867.5Kb)
Tarih
2022
Yazar
Gürsel, Güney
Turunç, Ömer
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını göster
Özet
Background and Purpose: Burnout syndrome (BOS), the popular phenomenon of our pandemic era, is examined in three dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and cynicism, and personal inefficiency. One of the known and accepted ways of measuring BOS is Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), in which these three dimensions are measured by 22 items, using 5‑ or 7‑point Likert scales. The aim of this study is to eliminate the loss of precision in BOS measurement and handle the subjectivity and uncertainty, as a result, to get rid of the bias caused by the classical way. Methods: To do this, fuzzy conjoint analysis (FCA) is used together with MBI. In the classical way, the calculations are made by assigning crisp values to the answers, which causes scientific bias and loss of precision because Likert scale type answers have subjectivity and uncertainty. Results: When the scores obtained with FCA are examined, all the scores and some BOS levels differ. When the position of the values according to the borders of the BOS levels is taken into account, it can be said that these tiny differences caused by the loss of precision make this difference. Conclusion: Findings show that the resulting scores changed significantly when calculations are made with FCA. Especially, when these scores are interpreted as intervals or grades, as in MBI, even tiny differences may result in significant scientific bias.
Bağlantı
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/1665
Koleksiyonlar
  • İşletme Bölümü / Department of Business Administration

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 




sherpa/romeo


Göz at

Tüm E-arşivBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişimBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişim

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


|| Kütüphane || Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Müdürlüğü, Antalya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: acikerisim@antalya.edu.tr

E-arşiv@AntalyaBilim:


DSpace 6.4-SNAPSHOT

Gemini Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş tarafından destek verilmektedir.